Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266116AbTATQMt>; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:12:49 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266186AbTATQMt>; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:12:49 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:13755 "EHLO main.gmane.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S266116AbTATQMs>;
	Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:12:48 -0500
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Path: not-for-mail
From: "Henrik Andersen" <peter900000@hotmail.com>
Subject: Intel C++ compiler?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:07:56 +0100
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <b0h6p3$958$1@main.gmane.org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Does Intels C++ compiler for Linux works fine for compiling the Linux
kernel? It is not 100% compatible, as far as I know. Which advantages does
the Intel compiler brings compared to gcc? faster speed? Other things?

Thanks in advance



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/