Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:49:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:49:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:21635 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:49:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 18:04:36 +0100 (CET) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Erich Focht Cc: Michael Hohnbaum , "Martin J. Bligh" , Matthew Dobson , Christoph Hellwig , Robert Love , Andrew Theurer , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , lse-tech Subject: Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ie. SMP is just the first level in the cache-hierarchy, NUMA is the > second level. (lets hope we dont have to deal with a third caching level > anytime soon - although that could as well happen once SMT CPUs start > doing NUMA.) or as Arjan points out, like the IBM x440 boxes ... i think we want to handle SMT on a different level, ie. via the shared-runqueue approach, so it's not a genuine new level of caching, it's rather a new concept of multiple logical cores per physical core. (which needs is own code in the scheduler.) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/