Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933842AbbENFKv (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 01:10:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:34875 "EHLO mail-pd0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751026AbbENFKr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 01:10:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 10:40:46 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Kukjin Kim Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Mike Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , Chanwoo Choi , Kevin Hilman , Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210platform Message-ID: <20150514051046.GB9887@linux> References: <'@samsung.com> <1428079429-4252-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <2036292.PZC6aPyUyX@amdc1976> <55541F92.4020404@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55541F92.4020404@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2161 Lines: 55 On 14-05-15, 13:07, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 05/13/15 23:08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > Hi Bart, > > > On Friday, April 03, 2015 06:43:43 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 specific support > >> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver > >> for this platform. > > > > Gentle Ping. Mike/Kukjin/Viresh could you please review/ack relevant > > patches (patches #1-3 are for clock subsystem, patches #4-5 for Exynos > > mach/dts and patch #6 is for cpufreq subsystem)? Sorry I thought I already Acked an older version of this set and so didn't went for it again. Done now. > Yes, I totally agreed with this patches for arch side changes and this > approach when Thomas posted. > > > Also what is your > > preferred way to upstream them (patches are not independent so it would > > be best to merge them through one tree, otherwise synchronization of > > git pulls between different subsystem trees will be needed)? > > > I can provide topic branch for arch side changes even it is small. I > think once Viresh and Mike make each topic branch based on -rc or the > smallest changes from each subsystem then I could handle this series or > Viresh or Mike need to handle this series with merging each topic > branches in subsystem. I'm fine either way. > > Viresh and Mike, how do you think about that? For cpufreq subsystem changes, you can take them in your tree. > > I'm still hoping that this patchset will make it into v4.2 as there are > > no known issues with it (except minor coding nit for patch #5)... > > > Sure, why not :-) One thing that looked wrong to me is the email id of Thomas.. I believe he has already left Samsung and his id wouldn't exist anymore. Right ? Then I wouldn't recommend something that doesn't exist to get merged now. Probably use another email id of his. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/