Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933429AbbENNH3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 09:07:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:60454 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933006AbbENNH0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 09:07:26 -0400 Message-ID: <55549E03.6040105@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 22:07:15 +0900 From: Kukjin Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar CC: Kukjin Kim , Lukasz Majewski , Kukjin Kim , Mike Turquette , Heiko Stuebner , Kevin Hilman , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , Thomas Abraham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sylwester Nawrocki , Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers forExynos4210platform References: <'@samsung.com> <1428079429-4252-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <2036292.PZC6aPyUyX@amdc1976> <55541F92.4020404@kernel.org> <20150514051046.GB9887@linux> In-Reply-To: <20150514051046.GB9887@linux> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2537 Lines: 67 On 05/14/15 14:10, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14-05-15, 13:07, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> On 05/13/15 23:08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >> Hi Bart, >> >>> On Friday, April 03, 2015 06:43:43 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 specific support >>>> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver >>>> for this platform. >>> >>> Gentle Ping. Mike/Kukjin/Viresh could you please review/ack relevant >>> patches (patches #1-3 are for clock subsystem, patches #4-5 for Exynos >>> mach/dts and patch #6 is for cpufreq subsystem)? > > Sorry I thought I already Acked an older version of this set and so > didn't went for it again. Done now. > >> Yes, I totally agreed with this patches for arch side changes and this >> approach when Thomas posted. >> >>> Also what is your >>> preferred way to upstream them (patches are not independent so it would >>> be best to merge them through one tree, otherwise synchronization of >>> git pulls between different subsystem trees will be needed)? >>> >> I can provide topic branch for arch side changes even it is small. I >> think once Viresh and Mike make each topic branch based on -rc or the >> smallest changes from each subsystem then I could handle this series or >> Viresh or Mike need to handle this series with merging each topic >> branches in subsystem. I'm fine either way. >> >> Viresh and Mike, how do you think about that? > > For cpufreq subsystem changes, you can take them in your tree. > Hi Viresh, OK, I will take the cpufreq changes with your ack. Thanks for your confirmation. Hi Mike and Sylwester, How can we handle this series well without any problems? hmm... >>> I'm still hoping that this patchset will make it into v4.2 as there are >>> no known issues with it (except minor coding nit for patch #5)... >>> >> Sure, why not :-) > > One thing that looked wrong to me is the email id of Thomas.. > I believe he has already left Samsung and his id wouldn't exist > anymore. Right ? > > Then I wouldn't recommend something that doesn't exist to get merged > now. Probably use another email id of his. As Bart replied, Thomas is still Samsung guy, maybe you meant Tomasz? he moved to another company last year. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/