Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:31:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:31:38 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:18951 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:31:37 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200301202040.h0KKehvn006650@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? To: davids@webmaster.com (David Schwartz) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 20:40:42 +0000 (GMT) Cc: david.lang@digitalinsight.com, dana.lacoste@peregrine.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030120201904.AAA25148@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> from "David Schwartz" at Jan 20, 2003 12:19:02 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >so are you saying it's illegal for an opensource project to use a > >commercial version control system, or that use of such a version > >control > >system by a GPL project forces the company to GPL their version > >control system? > > I don't understand how I can be clearer than I've already been. The > GPL requires you to do some things if you want to distribute > binaries. One of those things is to distribute the source code in the > "preferred form" for modifying it. Thus, if you don't have the source > code in its preferred form for making modifications, you can't > distribute binaries. OK - my current, (I.E. for this evening), prefered form is EBCDIC on a set of 80 or so 9-track tapes. Where can I get a copy of the kernel source in this format? John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/