Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:10:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:10:50 -0500 Received: from twilight.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.40.5]:7787 "EHLO twilight.cs.hut.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:10:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:19:43 +0200 From: Ville Herva To: John Bradford Cc: Jeff Garzik , peter900000@hotmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Intel C++ compiler? Message-ID: <20030120221943.GV1258@niksula.cs.hut.fi> Mail-Followup-To: Ville Herva , John Bradford , Jeff Garzik , peter900000@hotmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030120165417.GB27972@gtf.org> <200301201711.h0KHBEYR005837@darkstar.example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301201711.h0KHBEYR005837@darkstar.example.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 05:11:14PM +0000, you [John Bradford] wrote: > > > > Does Intels C++ compiler for Linux works fine for compiling the Linux > > > > kernel? It is not 100% compatible, as far as I know. > > > > > > I doubt it - Linux makes extensive use of GCC compiler extensions. > > > > I doubt your doubting. It works. > > I'm suprised. Sorry once again for the mis-information, (heh, but at > least it was on-topic, which is somewhat amasing for this mailing list > :-) ). Is there a concious effort to make it compile the kernel, or > are they aiming for general GCC compliance? I guess both. See http://lists.insecure.org/lists/linux-kernel/2002/Oct/6450.html Also, Intel has for long aimed to make icc on Linux to be as gcc compliant as possible. -- v -- v@iki.fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/