Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754568AbbEOGyX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 02:54:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:33474 "EHLO mail-wg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753954AbbEOGyW (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 02:54:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 08:54:17 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Borislav Petkov , Gu Zheng , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, espfix: use spin_lock rather than mutex Message-ID: <20150515065417.GB29973@gmail.com> References: <1431603465-12610-1-git-send-email-guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150514122621.GB29235@pd.tnic> <20150514182954.GB23479@gmail.com> <20150514212753.GE29125@pd.tnic> <55551E07.8080509@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55551E07.8080509@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1337 Lines: 38 * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/14/2015 02:27 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Remove stable@ from CC. > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:29:55PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> We could allocate them on the boot CPU side and hand them over to > >> the secondary CPU. > > > > Yeah, something along those lines. I mean, they're allocated and > > in-use during the complete system lifetime, we might just as well > > allocate them all in one go. Btw, what's our allocator that early, > > memblock? > > > > Still, what I find strange is why are we seeing this only now? Is > > it because it had to be a big box (cpu >= 128) or something else > > changed...? > > > > Quite probable. You don't really want to allocate them until you > know if a CPU at least exists, though. > > I like Ingo's suggestion of allocating them before CPU bringup on > the initiating CPU. The only slightly subtle detail with that is to use alloc_pages_node() with the secondary CPU's node, to make sure the espfix stack is NUMA-local to the CPU that is going to use it. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/