Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934413AbbEOH6F (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 03:58:05 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:62916 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934291AbbEOHwy (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 03:52:54 -0400 From: Wang Nan To: , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 32/37] tools perf bpf: probe at kprobe points. Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 07:51:25 +0000 Message-ID: <1431676290-1230-33-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.4 In-Reply-To: <1431676290-1230-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> References: <1431676290-1230-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.107.197.200] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3425 Lines: 128 In this patch, kprobe points are created using add_perf_probe_events. Since all events are already grouped together in an array, calling add_perf_probe_events() once creates all of them. To ensure recover the system when existing, a bpf_unprobe() is also provided and hooked to atexit(). Because all of events are in group "perf_bpf_probe" (PERF_BPF_PROBE_GROUP), use 'perf_bpf_probe:*' string to remove all of them should be a simple method. However, this also introduces a constrain that only one instance of 'perf bpf' is allowed to be active. Due to the atexit hook, this patch must ensure bpf_unprobe() won't error if it has been executed. A global flag 'is_probing' is used to track probing state. bpf_unprobe() will do nothing if it is unset. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan --- tools/perf/builtin-bpf.c | 8 ++++++++ tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-bpf.c b/tools/perf/builtin-bpf.c index e922921..95e0c65 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-bpf.c @@ -157,10 +157,18 @@ static int cmd_bpf_record(int argc, const char **argv, } } + if (bpf_probe()) { + pr_err("bpf: failed to probe\n"); + goto errout; + } + return start_bpf_record(argc, argv); usage: usage_with_options(bpf_record_usage, options); return -1; +errout: + bpf_clear(); + return -1; } diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c index 3dc9b61..c820d1a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c @@ -160,9 +160,57 @@ void bpf_clear(void) { size_t i; + bpf_unprobe(); for (i = 0; i < params.nr_events; i++) clear_perf_probe_event(¶ms.event_array[i]); for (i = 0; i < params.nr_objects; i++) bpf_close_object(params.objects[i]); } + +static bool is_probing = false; + +int bpf_unprobe(void) +{ + struct strlist *dellist; + int ret; + + if (!is_probing) + return 0; + + dellist = strlist__new(true, PERF_BPF_PROBE_GROUP ":*"); + if (!dellist) { + pr_err("Failed to create dellist when unprobing\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + ret = del_perf_probe_events(dellist); + strlist__delete(dellist); + if (ret < 0) + pr_err(" Error: failed to delete events: %s\n", + strerror(-ret)); + else + is_probing = false; + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; +} + +static void bpf_unprobe_atexit(void) +{ + bpf_unprobe(); +} + +int bpf_probe(void) +{ + int err = add_perf_probe_events(params.event_array, + params.nr_events, + MAX_PROBES, 0); + /* add_perf_probe_events return negative when fail */ + if (err < 0) + pr_err("bpf probe: failed to probe events\n"); + else { + is_probing = true; + atexit(bpf_unprobe_atexit); + } + + return err < 0 ? err : 0; +} diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h index 74eebc3..30dea2e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ #define __BPF_LOADER_H int bpf_prepare_load(const char *filename); +int bpf_probe(void); +int bpf_unprobe(void); void bpf_clear(void); #endif -- 1.8.3.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/