Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 02:58:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 02:58:37 -0500 Received: from modemcable092.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.92]:33936 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 02:58:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 03:07:33 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Manfred Spraul cc: Alan , Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function_mask In-Reply-To: <3E2CF327.8030107@colorfullife.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Manfred Spraul wrote: > from 2.5.52, > #define atomic_read(v) ((v)->counter) > AFAIK atomic_read never contained locked bus cycles. > > Btw, Zwane, what about removing non_atomic from the prototype? The funny thing is, there are about 3 different versions of smp_call_function and removing nonatomic would reduce the argument count (there are some architectures which use 'retry' in nonatomic's place) and i'm a bit wary of making other archs bend over for i386 these days. Perhaps renaming it to __unused or something similarly obvious. Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/