Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 03:57:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 03:57:23 -0500 Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:49820 "EHLO waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 03:57:22 -0500 Message-Id: <200301210851.h0L8pFLV002733@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> To: David Schwartz cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Linux Kernel Mailing List , brand@eeyore.valparaiso.cl Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:27:21 PST." <20030120212723.AAA1911@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:51:14 +0100 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Schwartz said: [...] > >So is shipping the source without a neuron dump of the programmer - > >let's face > >it, we've ALL looked at code and said "What WERE they thinking?", > >and therefor > >a neuron dump would be part of the *preferred* format. > If the people who make most of the modifications have access to and > use such a dump in the process of making modifications, then it would > probably be part of the preferred form. Hummm. _now_ I see the fundamental problem: The GPL isn't distributed with a neuron dump of RMS so we can check what he meant by "preferred format". Seems the GPL is being distributed illegally... [Can we let this die, now? Pretty please?] -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/