Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753170AbbEQNjN (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2015 09:39:13 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:26460 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753067AbbEQNjH (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2015 09:39:07 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,445,1427752800"; d="scan'208";a="150003182" Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 15:39:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@localhost6.localdomain6 To: Dmitry Kalinkin cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , Michal Marek Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: api: add vma_pages.cocci In-Reply-To: <1431821187-21648-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kalinkin@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1431821187-21648-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kalinkin@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3682 Lines: 129 On Sun, 17 May 2015, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote: > This semantic patch replaces explicit computations of vma page count > with explicit function call. Thanks! > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kalinkin > --- > scripts/coccinelle/api/vma_pages.cocci | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 scripts/coccinelle/api/vma_pages.cocci > > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/vma_pages.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/vma_pages.cocci > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..2b7a748 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/vma_pages.cocci > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ > +/// Use vma_pages function on vma object instead of explicit computation. Add an extra /// here. > +// Confidence: High > +// Keywords: vma_pages vma > + > +// Based on resource_size.cocci > + > +virtual context > +virtual patch > +virtual org > +virtual report > + > +//---------------------------------------------------------- > +// For context mode > +//---------------------------------------------------------- > + > +@r_context depends on context && !patch && !org@ Add && !report here > +struct vm_area_struct *vma; > +@@ > + > +* (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT > + > +//---------------------------------------------------------- > +// For patch mode > +//---------------------------------------------------------- > + > +@r_patch1 depends on !context && patch && !org@ Add && !report here > +struct vm_area_struct *vma; > +@@ > + > +- ((vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) > ++ vma_pages(vma) > + > +@r_patch2 depends on !context && patch && !org@ > +struct vm_area_struct *vma; > +@@ > + > +- (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT > ++ vma_pages(vma) This rule is not needed. An isomorphism will allow tha case with () around the whole thing to match the case where those parentheses are absent. > +//---------------------------------------------------------- > +// For org mode > +//---------------------------------------------------------- > + > +@r_org depends on !context && !patch && (org || report)@ > +struct vm_area_struct *vma; > +position p; > +@@ > + > + (vma->vm_end@p - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT > + > +@script:python depends on report@ > +p << r_org.p; > +x << r_org.vma; > +@@ > + > +msg="ERROR: Missing vma_pages with %s" % (x) I think that the message is a bit misleading. Something like Use vma_pages would be better. > +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg) > + > +@script:python depends on org@ > +p << r_org.p; > +x << r_org.vma; > +@@ > + > +msg="ERROR with %s" % (x) > +msg_safe=msg.replace("[","@(").replace("]",")") > +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], msg_safe) The message could be the same in this case as in the previous one. It may be good to put below the keywords: // Comments: // Options: --all-includes This rule relies on type information, ie knowing whether something has type struct vm_area_struct *, so having more include files available may make that more apparent. On the other hand, if you think the referenced thing will always be a local variable (as opposed to a structure field), then just using the current C file should be good enough, and it will be faster without the --all-includes option. I tried the rule replacing struct vm_area_struct *vma; by expression vma and got a couple of results on other types. One could wonder if that code could be improved in some way. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/