Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:40:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:40:34 -0500 Received: from modemcable092.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.92]:54171 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:40:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:49:42 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Manfred Spraul cc: Alan , Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function_mask In-Reply-To: <3E2D7FB2.80806@colorfullife.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Manfred Spraul wrote: > You can blame me for the mess with smp_call_function: > 2.2 supported nonatomic calls. I have no idea if that was deadlock free. > > But noone used the 'retry/nonatomic' parameter, noone handled an error > return of smp_call_function (some callers panic). > Thus I've removed these features from i386, without changing the > prototype. I think all archs have picked that up now. > But retry/nonatomic should not spread into new functions. Ok i'll send something with forced retry and removing the nonatomic/retry parameter completely. Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/