Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267163AbTAUStE>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:49:04 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267164AbTAUStE>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:49:04 -0500
Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:17925 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S267163AbTAUStD>;
	Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:49:03 -0500
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:58:08 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc: dana.lacoste@peregrine.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
Message-ID: <20030121185808.GA1261@mars.ravnborg.org>
Mail-Followup-To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>,
	dana.lacoste@peregrine.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1043165072.1397.61.camel@dlacoste.ottawa.loran.com> <20030121183414.AAA4503@shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030121183414.AAA4503@shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:34:12AM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
> 	This can't be right for two reasons.
> 
> 	First, I would in fact prefer to have the version control 
> information to make changes. The commit comments, for example, may 
> explain the rationale for changes.

The commit comments are available, so why arguing?

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/