Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754515AbbERSVJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 14:21:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42946 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752230AbbERSVG (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 14:21:06 -0400 From: Prarit Bhargava To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Prarit Bhargava , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Denys Vlasenko , Dave Hansen , Peter P Waskiewicz Jr , Igor Mammedov , Fenghua Yu Subject: [PATCH] x86, cpuinfo fix cpu_data(0) x86_model_id field truncation Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:21:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1431973260-24617-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3189 Lines: 81 When comparing 'model name' fields in /proc/cpuinfo it was noticed that a simple test comparing the model name fields was failing. After some simple investigation it was noticed that, in fact, the model name fields are different for each processor. Processor 0's model name field had white space removed, while the other processors did not. Another way of seeing this behaviour is to convert spaces into underscores in the output of /proc/cpuinfo, [thetango@prarit ~]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g' ______1_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272 _____63_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272_________________ which shows two different model name fields even though they should be the same. This occurs because the kernel calls strim() on cpu 0's x86_model_id field to output a pretty message to the console in print_cpu_info(), and as a result truncates the whitespace at the end of the x86_model_id field. The x86_model_id field should be the same for the same processors. This patch adds a local copy of the x86_model_id field and modifies the value there so that the output in dmesg still looks like smpboot: CPU0: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6272 (fam: 15, model: 01, stepping: 02) and the x86_model_id field is correct across all processors: [thetango@prarit ~]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g' _____64_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272_________________ Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr Cc: Igor Mammedov Cc: Fenghua Yu --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index a62cf04..61ac5c3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ __setup("noclflush", setup_noclflush); void print_cpu_info(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { const char *vendor = NULL; + char x86_model_id[64]; if (c->x86_vendor < X86_VENDOR_NUM) { vendor = this_cpu->c_vendor; @@ -1121,9 +1122,10 @@ void print_cpu_info(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) if (vendor && !strstr(c->x86_model_id, vendor)) printk(KERN_CONT "%s ", vendor); - if (c->x86_model_id[0]) - printk(KERN_CONT "%s", strim(c->x86_model_id)); - else + if (c->x86_model_id[0]) { + strcpy(x86_model_id, c->x86_model_id); + printk(KERN_CONT "%s", strim(x86_model_id)); + } else printk(KERN_CONT "%d86", c->x86); printk(KERN_CONT " (fam: %02x, model: %02x", c->x86, c->x86_model); -- 1.7.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/