Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964786AbbERUiS (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 16:38:18 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com ([209.85.192.43]:35696 "EHLO mail-qg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932968AbbERUiO (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 16:38:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:38:09 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Lai Jiangshan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current default pwq when its attrs unchanged Message-ID: <20150518203809.GF24861@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1431433955-3173-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> <1431433955-3173-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1431433955-3173-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 870 Lines: 24 Hello, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:32:33PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > When apply_wqattrs_prepare() is called, it is possible that the default > pwq is unaffected. It is always true that only the NUMA affinity is being > changed and sometimes true that the low level cpumask is being changed. > > So we try to reuse the current default pwq when its attrs unchanged. > > After this change, "ctx->dfl_pwq->refcnt++" could be dangerous > when ctx->dfl_pwq is being reused, so we use get_pwq_unlocked() instead. Can you elaborate the above paragraph? Why wouldn't that be dangerous before this change? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/