Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:24:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:24:13 -0500 Received: from tux.mkp.net ([130.225.60.11]:5124 "EHLO tux.mkp.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:23:56 -0500 To: Michael E Brown Cc: Subject: Re: block ioctl to read/write last sector In-Reply-To: From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: mkp.net Date: 14 Feb 2001 09:23:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Michael" == Michael E Brown writes: Michael, Michael> It looks like the numbers we picked for our respective IOCTLs Michael> conflict. I think I can change mine to the next higher since Michael> your patch seems to have been around longer. If you could pick another number that would be great. All the people out there using XFS rely on the BLKSETSIZE ioctl, and mkfs.xfs would break horribly with your patch. Michael> What is the general way to deal with these conflicts? Whoever applies the patch to the official tree deals with them :) -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/