Message-ID: <555AE9AB.8060106@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:43:39 +0800
From: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
CC: joro@8bytes.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
        bhelgaas@google.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com,
        bhe@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
        ddutile@redhat.com, ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, doug.hatch@hp.com,
        jerry.hoemann@hp.com, tom.vaden@hp.com, li.zhang6@hp.com,
        lisa.mitchell@hp.com, billsumnerlinux@gmail.com, rwright@hp.com,
        "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel vt-d faults in kdump kernel
References: <1431337974-545-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com> <5552AEE9.80408@hp.com> <5559B97B.5090805@hp.com> <20150519011322.GA7065@dhcp-128-76.nay.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150519011322.GA7065@dhcp-128-76.nay.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1419
Lines: 44

Hi Dave,

Don't worry :).
Of cause I have read your comments, but most of them contains no actual
code change request, so I did not reply them one by one.
When we are sure there is no actual code change needed, I will update
the comments and other format problems if necessary.

Regards
Zhenhua

On 05/19/2015 09:13 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/18/15 at 06:05pm, Li, ZhenHua wrote:
>> Hi Joerg,
>>
>> Testing from HP: passed.
>> Testing from He Baoquan(Redhat): passed
>>
>> The problem that dmar fault came again when running v10 with latest
>> kernel is fixed.
>> And I think there is no need to update the code to a new version now.
>>
>> So please tell me if there are still any code need to be changed.
>
> Have you reviewed all my comments? Although it is only iommu driver fixes,
> The patches are sent to lkml, no? If you do not want other people's comments
> why will you send to us? I would say do not assume it is a closed circle for
> only iommu driver.
>
> It is not easy to review patches actually, frankly I feel kernel code review
> is not so strict like the early days, maybe one reason is people are getting
> tired to argue.
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/