Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932559AbbESNhD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 09:37:03 -0400 Received: from 251.110.2.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.2.110.251]:60802 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932154AbbESNg5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 09:36:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:35:40 +0100 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Mel Gorman Cc: Anisse Astier , Andrew Morton , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , David Rientjes , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , PaX Team , Brad Spengler , Kees Cook , Andi Kleen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Sanitizing freed pages Message-ID: <20150519143540.70410b94@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150519124644.GD2462@suse.de> References: <1431613188-4511-1-git-send-email-anisse@astier.eu> <20150519124644.GD2462@suse.de> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1480 Lines: 35 > may be some benefits in some cases, I think it's a weak justification for > always zeroing pages on free. There are much better reasons for zero on free, including the improved latency when pages are faulted in. For virtualisation there are two interfaces that would probably make more sense 1. 'This page is of no further interest, you may fault it back in as random data' 2. 'This page is discardable, if I touch it *and* you have discarded it then please serve me an exception, if you've not discarded it them give it me back" If I remember my 390 bits the S/390 goes further including the ability to say "if I think this page is in memory but in fact the hypervisor is going to page it off disc then throw me an exception so I can do clever things with the delay time" > > - finally, it can reduce infoleaks, although this is hard to measure. > > > It obscures them. Actually not. If you are doing debug work you zero on free and check for mysterious non zeroing before reusing the page. Without that its a win in the sense it wipes material (but crypto does that anyway), but it replaces that with the risk of a zeroed page being scibbled upon by the kernel and leaking kernel scribbles into allocated user pages. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/