Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754452AbbESSYT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 14:24:19 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:62042 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751611AbbESSYR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 14:24:17 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Stefan Agner , mark.rutland@arm.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, Russell King - ARM Linux , jason@lakedaemon.net, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, marc.zyngier@arm.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, olof@lixom.net, galak@codeaurora.org, Thomas Gleixner , shawn.guo@linaro.org, Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/13] ARM: unify MMU/!MMU addruart calls Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:24:04 +0200 Message-ID: <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1431769465-26867-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch> <2419398.cbLWQC7K5f@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:I9kZj5mgpCzaI9PqmY7ecENEJOUe+gaiC1geBwfoAhubwLHTSLC bKPbS3numTZ7A0bnmOpyi9eI6EQ7/XaM+2WgBEVu3dxW0zv6l6WTlQpA8onRou7zeGPrkm+ YuX+KbOb+2eYR+KyJCyR6q+KUEtjHVgJusfDGY98hBDJ1bD2UYlHZRaPXTc++FKV1AYaFP+ P3RBjC+a7QvscqHePK0zQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2273 Lines: 49 On Tuesday 19 May 2015 18:06:53 Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2015-05-19 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 13:23:22 Stefan Agner wrote: > >> On 2015-05-19 12:16, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > >> Not sure how we can deal with the EFM32 vs. IMX changes... Patches 08-10 > >> has no dependencies on the clock changes which Thomas merged. They could > >> go through whatever EFM32 is merged normally (last time Arnd directly > >> merged from Uwe), and then Shawn could base the rest of the changes on > >> that too? > > > > Do you have a dependency on patch 10 (the one for EFM32) in your later > > patches? > > Unfortunately, there is a dependency on that patch: I change the default > of UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE to debug/uncompress.h for all ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M > platforms. Without that patch, it would default to mach/uncompress.h, > which does not exist for MACH_MXC/SOC_VF610. An easy approach would be to list both ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and EFM32 in the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE option initially, and then follow-up with a patch that converts the three other platforms (efm32, stm32 and lpc18xx) to ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and also change the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE statement. Note that I've already added both stm32 and lpc18xx to the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE list in the next/soc branch. > > If not, you can send the other ones to Shawn, so I pull them as > > a branch, and then I apply that on top of the merges. I have also > > merged two other ARMv7M platforms for 4.2 now (both in next/soc), > > so we should do the same change for those as well, and I'd rather > > apply a patch for that, than merge a branch that is based on > > next/soc. > > I guess, in that case, you need to take the others too? (08/09?) I'm fine with that, too. If Shawn thinks the patches are ok, you can just send all patches you want me to apply in arm-soc based on the appropriate branches (next/soc, next/dt and next/defconfig, I presume), and I'll apply them this time. In the future, you should send all patches to Shawn though. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/