Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261337AbTAVPSd>; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:18:33 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261518AbTAVPSc>; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:18:32 -0500
Received: from sprocket.loran.com ([209.167.240.9]:30453 "EHLO
	ottonexc1.peregrine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261337AbTAVPSc>; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:18:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
From: Dana Lacoste <dana.lacoste@peregrine.com>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20030122151826.GA23656@work.bitmover.com>
References: <CDEDIMAGFBEBKHDJPCLDCEEKCFAA.huaz@sbcglobal.net>
	<20030122071028.GA3466@bjl1.asuk.net> 
	<20030122151826.GA23656@work.bitmover.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 22 Jan 2003 10:27:40 -0500
Message-Id: <1043249260.1397.200.camel@dlacoste.ottawa.loran.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:18, Larry McVoy wrote:

> A boundary is a boundary.  It doesn't matter how much you want or need
> what is on the other side of that boundary, you don't get to make your
> license cross that boundary, the law doesn't work that way.

Thus the concept of "derivative work."

The single most vague section of the GPL IMHO.

Can we move on now?  We're not going to resolve anything here,
and i think we're all argued out :)

Dana Lacoste
Ottawa, Canada

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/