Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756021AbbESSvB (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 14:51:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50372 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752647AbbESSu5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 14:50:57 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <31154.1431965087@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <555A88FB.7000809@kernel.org> <29742.1432025631@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1752.1432049417@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <5261.1432060684@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, LSM List Subject: Re: Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5502.1432061449.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:50:49 +0100 Message-ID: <5503.1432061449@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 494 Lines: 14 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > No, in the hash tree variant, it really is 32 bytes. No one ever > needs the full list once the build is done. Yes, you do. You have to check the hash on the hash list or you can't trust it. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/