Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752049AbbESUfO (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:35:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:48634 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751411AbbESUfL (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:35:11 -0400 Message-ID: <555B9E7B.9000809@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:35:07 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brent Wang CC: Bintian , linux-arm-kernel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Kevin Hilman , Mike Turquette , Rob Herring , Zhangfei Gao , Haojian Zhuang , Xu Wei , Jaehoon Chung , Olof Johansson , Haifeng Yan , "xuejiancheng@huawei.com" , "sledge.yanwei@huawei.com" , Tomeu Vizoso , Russell King - ARM Linux , Guodong Xu , Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz , Tyler Baker , Kevin Hilman , pebolle@tiscali.nl, Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , "xuyiping@hisilicon.com" , "wangbinghui@hisilicon.com" , "zhenwei.wang@hisilicon.com" , "victor.lixin@hisilicon.com" , "puck.chen@hisilicon.com" , "dan.zhao@hisilicon.com" , "huxinwei@huawei.com" , "z.liuxinliang@huawei.com" , "heyunlei@huawei.com" , XinWei Kong , "btw@mail.itp.ac.cn" , "w.f@huawei.com" , "Liguozhu (Kenneth)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon hi6220 SoC References: <1430827599-11560-1-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <1430827599-11560-5-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <20150515002527.GD31753@codeaurora.org> <5555A37B.1090105@huawei.com> <20150515193041.GO31753@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 904 Lines: 24 On 05/15/15 19:54, Brent Wang wrote: > >>> How about just send this patch for review not the whole patch set in >>> next version? >>> >> Yes a single patch is fine. I take it you want the patch to go >> through arm-soc with some Ack from us? > Yes, exactly. > The dts file includes the clock head file, this patch goes through > arm-soc is a good choice. One way to avoid that problem is to split the clock header file into its own patch and then duplicate that patch in two trees, one that goes through arm-soc and one that goes through clk. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/