Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752105AbbESWHg (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 18:07:36 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:38262 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750865AbbESWHf (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 18:07:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:07:25 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Steven Rostedt Cc: NeilBrown , Patrick Marlier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] md/bitmap: Fix list_entry_rcu usage Message-ID: <20150519220725.GA6776@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20150512224603.GA4531@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1431470787-4702-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1431470787-4702-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150512223853.55e0ed90@grimm.local.home> <20150513125839.371ef677@notabene.brown> <5557819E.1060001@gmail.com> <20150518120647.0c3cecd8@notabene.brown> <20150518094321.2012a66a@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150518094321.2012a66a@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15051922-0005-0000-0000-00000AF35733 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2672 Lines: 71 On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:43:21AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2015 12:06:47 +1000 > NeilBrown wrote: > > > > > struct mddev { > > > ... > > > struct list_head disks; > > > ...} > > > > > > struct list_head { > > > struct list_head *next, *prev; > > > }; > > > > > > The tricky thing is that "list_entry_rcu" before and after the patch is > > > reading the same thing. > > > > No it isn't. > > Before the patch it is passed the address of the 'next' field. After the > > patch it is passed the contents of the 'next' field. > > Right. > > > > > > > > > > > However in your case, the change I proposed is probably wrong I trust > > > you on this side. :) What's your proposal to fix it with the rculist patch? > > > > What needs fixing? I don't see anything broken. > > > > Maybe there is something in this "rculist patch" that I'm missing. Can you > > point me at it? > > > > Probably some debugging tool like sparse notices that the assignment > isn't a true list entry and complains about it. In other words, I think > the real fix is to fix the debugging tool to ignore this, because the > code is correct, and this is a false positive failure, and is causing > more harm than good, because people are sending out broken patches due > to it. OK, finally did the history trawling that I should have done to begin with. Back in 2010, Arnd added the __rcu pointer checking in sparse. But the RCU list primitives were used on non-RCU-protected lists, so some casting pain was required to avoid sparse complaints. (Keep in mind that the list_head structure does not mark ->next with __rcu.) Arnd's workaround was to copy the pointer to the local stack, casting it to an __rcu pointer, then use rcu_dereference_raw() to do the needed traversal of an RCU-protected pointer. This of course resulted in an extraneous load from the stack, which Patrick noticed in his performance work, and which motivated him to send the patches. Perhaps what I should do is create an rcu_dereference_nocheck() for use in list traversals, that omits the sparse checking. That should get rid of both the sparse warnings and the strange casts. The code in md probably needs to change in any case, as otherwise we are invoking rcu_dereference_whatever() on a full struct list_head rather than on a single pointer. Or am I missing something here? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/