Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752899AbbETIdz (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 04:33:55 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:58627 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbbETIdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 04:33:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:33:35 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Eddie Huang Cc: Mark Rutland , Xudong Chen , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Wolfram Sang , Liguo Zhang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer , Kumar Gala , Matthias Brugger , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] I2C: mediatek: Add driver for MediaTek I2C controller Message-ID: <20150520083335.GQ24769@pengutronix.de> References: <1431967209-5261-1-git-send-email-eddie.huang@mediatek.com> <1431967209-5261-3-git-send-email-eddie.huang@mediatek.com> <20150518184300.GB28888@pengutronix.de> <1432089611.13819.9.camel@mtksdaap41> <20150520071152.GP24769@pengutronix.de> <1432108775.12796.11.camel@mtksdaap41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1432108775.12796.11.camel@mtksdaap41> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2845 Lines: 73 Hello Eddie, On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:59:35PM +0800, Eddie Huang wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:11 +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:40:11AM +0800, Eddie Huang wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 20:43 +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:40:08AM +0800, Eddie Huang wrote: > > > > > +/* calculate i2c port speed */ > > > > It would be nice to summarize the clock frequency settings here. > > > > Something like: > > > > > > > > /* > > > > * The input clock is divided by the value specified in the > > > > * device tree as clock-div. The actual bus speed is then > > > > * derived from this frequency by the following formula: > > > > * .... > > > > > > > > This would make it possible to verify your calculations below. > > > > > > The comment will be: > > > /* > > > * khz: I2C bus clock > > > * hclk: The input clock is divided by the value specified in the > > > * device tree as clock-div > > and which one of the two clocks you're writing about is hclk now? I > > assume the divided one. > > > * div = (sample_cnt + 1) * (step_cnt + 1) > > > * khz = (hclk / 2) / div > > khz for the 2nd time. > > > > > * > > > * The calculation is to get div value that let result of > > > * ((hclk / 2) / div) most approach and less than khz > > > */ > > I imagined something more hardware related. A list of register (or > > register bit fields) that influence the frequency and a formula > > > i2c_freq = parent_clk / clock-div * (...) > > > > (It seems to be a bit more complicated here as there are two registers > > involved that are set differently depending on the target frequency.) > > Yes, hardware is a little complicated. I rewrite the comment: > > /* > * Calculate i2c port speed > * > * Hardware design: > * i2c_bus_freq = parent_clk / (clock-div * 2 * (sample_cnt) * > (step_cnt)) > * clock-div: fixed in hardware, but may be various in different SoCs ... fixed in hardware, but different on different SoCs. > * > * The calculation want to pick the highest bus frequency that is still > * less than or equal to i2c->speed_hz. and the calculation try to get > * sample_cnt and step_cnt to fill in hardware register. "The calculation picks the highest bus frequency that is still less than or equal to i2c->speed_hz." and I'd drop the last sentence. With that in mind I'll reply once more to the original patch. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/