Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 04:45:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 04:45:23 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:55046 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 04:45:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:49:56 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu cc: hps@intermeta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux in the News! WooHoo! In-Reply-To: <200301230825.h0N8Pi75029232@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 08:01:23 GMT, "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" said: > > Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu writes: > > >It's open sourced. The rest is left as an exercise for the reader. > > > > Enough exercising for you? > > Yes, I'm fully aware of the size of OpenOffice. So far I've had at least > a dozen people who apparently didn't pick up on the sarcasm without a smiley. > > Now to tie it back to another thread - the OpenOffice is just so honking HUGE > that a good case could be made that the source tarball is not the preferred > form for making modifications, because that sucker *has* to be in an IDE for > you to be able to find what it is you wanted to modify. ;) Well last time I checked most things are stored in an IDE (disk); regardless of the tools. I could not let this one slip by. Cheers, Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/