Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:54:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:54:27 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:59153 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:54:20 -0500 Subject: Re: IDE DMA Problems...system hangs To: jsidhu@arraycomm.com (Jasmeet Sidhu) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:54:26 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), jsidhu@arraycomm.com (Jasmeet Sidhu), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010214123238.023ea9c0@pop.arraycomm.com> from "Jasmeet Sidhu" at Feb 14, 2001 12:40:01 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >You will get horribly bad performance off raid5 if you have stripes on both > >hda/hdb or hdc/hdd etc. > > If I am reading this correctly, then by striping on both hda/hdb and > /hdc/hdd you mean that I have two drives per ide channel. In other words, > you think I have a Master and a Slave type of a setup? This is > incorrect. Each drive on the system is a master. I have 5 promise cards Ok then your performance should be fine (at least reasonably so, the lack of tagged queueing does hurt) > ide chanel, the penalty should not be much in terms of performance. Maybe > its just that the hdparam utility is not a good tool for benchamarking a > raid set? Its not a good raid benchmark tool but its a good indication of general problems. Bonnie is a good tool for accurate assessment. > disable DMA if its giving it a lot of problems, but it should not hang. I > have been experiencing this for quite a while with the newer > kernels. Should I try the latest ac13 patch? I glanced of the changes and > didnt seem like anything had changed regarding the ide subsystem. I've not changed anything related to DMA handling specifically. The current -ac does have a fix for a couple of cases where an IDE reset on the promise could hang the box dead. That may be the problem. > Is there anyway I can force the kernel to output more messages...maybe that > could help narrow down the problem? Ask andre@linux-ide.org. He may know the status of the promise support - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/