Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:54:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:54:07 -0500 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]:39696 "EHLO mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:53:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:53:50 -0600 (CST) From: Jeff Garzik To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ECN for servers ? In-Reply-To: <96eqhm$33k$1@cesium.transmeta.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14 Feb 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > By author: Petru Paler > > What is the impact of enabling ECN on the server side ? I mean, will > > any clients (with broken firewalls) be affected if a SMTP/HTTP server > > has ECN enabled ? > Pro: better behaviour in presence of network congestion. > > Con: people behind broken firewalls can't connect. Since you can use ICMP to tunnel data, a lot of security ppl are reluctant to stop filtering ICMP :/ Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/