Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:01:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:01:17 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:13326 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:01:12 -0500 Message-ID: <3A8AF203.864461CD@transmeta.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:00:51 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, sv, no, da, es, fr, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ECN for servers ? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On 14 Feb 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > By author: Petru Paler > > > What is the impact of enabling ECN on the server side ? I mean, will > > > any clients (with broken firewalls) be affected if a SMTP/HTTP server > > > has ECN enabled ? > > > Pro: better behaviour in presence of network congestion. > > > > Con: people behind broken firewalls can't connect. > > Since you can use ICMP to tunnel data, a lot of security ppl are > reluctant to stop filtering ICMP :/ > You can use DNS to tunnel data, too. As far as ICMP is concerned, perhaps they should consider sterilizing approaches instead. -hp -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/