Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755263AbbEULsS (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 07:48:18 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]:32903 "EHLO mail-oi0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753366AbbEULsQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 07:48:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150521111710.475482798@infradead.org> References: <20150521111710.475482798@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 04:48:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Various x86 pmu scheduling patches From: Stephane Eranian To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Vince Weaver , Jiri Olsa , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 17 Peter, On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Unless I messed things up again, patch 1 and 2 are for perf/urgent and the rest > can wait. > > I would still like to relax the HT scheduling constraint in case there are no > funny events at all, but I've not yet found a nice way to do that. > Are you talking about the HT bug workaround? If there is no corrupting event across HT threads, then scheduling is not impacted. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/