Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756614AbbEUV31 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 17:29:27 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:62337 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756465AbbEUV3Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 17:29:25 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,471,1427752800"; d="scan'208";a="152663816" Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 23:29:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Joe Perches cc: Mike Shuey , oleg.drokin@intel.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, lustre-deve@lists.lustre.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl fixes In-Reply-To: <1432242004.20840.68.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: References: <1432237849-53947-1-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu> <1432237849-53947-11-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu> <1432242004.20840.68.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1326 Lines: 36 On Thu, 21 May 2015, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 15:50 -0400, Mike Shuey wrote: > > Fix many checkpatch.pl warnings. > [] > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c > [] > > @@ -99,38 +99,42 @@ lnet_connect_console_error(int rc, lnet_nid_t peer_nid, > > switch (rc) { > > /* "normal" errors */ > > case -ECONNREFUSED: > > - CNETERR("Connection to %s at host %pI4h on port %d was refused: check that Lustre is running on that node.\n", > > - libcfs_nid2str(peer_nid), > > - &peer_ip, peer_port); > > + CNETERR( > > + "Connection to %s at host %pI4h on port %d was refused: check that Lustre is running on that node.\n", > > + libcfs_nid2str(peer_nid), &peer_ip, peer_port); > > These are not improvements and checkpatch messages aren't dicta. > > Please don't convert code unless the conversion makes it better > for a human reader. > > These don't. I haven't looked into it, but perhaps there is a standard kernel printing function that these could be converted to directly? julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/