Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:50:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:50:46 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:11708 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:50:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:00:01 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Nick Piggin Cc: dmo@osdl.org, axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, markw@osdl.org, cliffw@osdl.org, maryedie@osdl.org, jenny@osdl.org Subject: Re: [BUG] BUG_ON in I/O scheduler, bugme # 288 Message-Id: <20030123180001.426f165e.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <3E30990D.3090305@cyberone.com.au> References: <20030123135448.A8801@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> <3E30990D.3090305@cyberone.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2003 01:59:40.0872 (UTC) FILETIME=[41CD9C80:01C2C34C] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > I think this may be because > deadline_add_drq_rb puts "aliased" requests in the next_drq although they > are not put on the sort or fifo lists. This is the problem I described to > you before and exists in mm4. Yes, but 2.5.59 doesn't do that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/