From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine=2DK=F6nig?= 
	<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, manabian@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
        olof@lixom.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH defconfig] ARM: add ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M in ARMv7-M defconfigs
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 16:56:21 +0200
Message-ID: <10931476.klXfLPFTLM@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150521082604.GZ24769@pengutronix.de>
References: <1432161501-2323-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch> <20150521082604.GZ24769@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 889
Lines: 21

On Thursday 21 May 2015 10:26:04 Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:38:21AM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > Select ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M in defconfigs of the converted ARMv7-M
> > platforms.
> I assume this relates to your series that introduces this symbol. Should
> the defconfig update happen before? (Or what is the result if
> CONFIG_ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M=y is missing in the defconfig while the symbol
> already exists?) Maybe this should be squashed into the commit in
> question?
> 

I've folded the efm32_defconfig change into the patch that introduces
the ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M symbol now, to avoid bisection problems.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/