Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:24:19 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@redhat.com,
        acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
        dsahern@gmail.com, ast@plumgrid.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
        brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com,
        lizefan@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama@163.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 28/37] perf tools: Make perf depend on libbpf
Message-ID: <20150522172419.GG6609@krava.redhat.com>
References: <1431860222-61636-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
 <1431860222-61636-29-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1431860222-61636-29-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 774
Lines: 30

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:56:53AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:

SNIP

>  else
>    TE_PATH=$(TRACE_EVENT_DIR)
>    LIB_PATH=$(LIB_DIR)
> +  BPF_PATH=$(BPF_DIR)
>  endif
>  
>  LIBTRACEEVENT = $(TE_PATH)libtraceevent.a
> @@ -174,6 +177,9 @@ export LIBTRACEEVENT
>  LIBAPI = $(LIB_PATH)libapi.a
>  export LIBAPI
>  
> +LIBBPF = $(BPF_PATH)/libbpf.a
> +export LIBBPF

hum, why does LIBBPF need to be exported?

if it's to match the LIBAPI, it's exported because
of its usage in the util/setup.py, which is not the
case for LIBBPF

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/