Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757942AbbEWMJ5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2015 08:09:57 -0400 Received: from mailhub248.itcs.purdue.edu ([128.210.5.248]:35514 "EHLO mailhub248.itcs.purdue.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757375AbbEWMJz (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2015 08:09:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150523101428.GX22558@mwanda> References: <1432237849-53947-1-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu> <20150522092142.GJ4150@mwanda> <20150523101428.GX22558@mwanda> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 08:09:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups From: Michael Shuey To: Dan Carpenter Cc: "Drokin, Oleg" , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-PMX-Version: 6.0.2.2308539 X-PerlMx-URL-Scanned: Yes X-PerlMx-Virus-Scanned: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1848 Lines: 41 Hm, that's unfortunate - but my own fault for lack of proper etiquette. I'll give this a week or two to settle, and build up patches against other parts of lustre in the meantime. BTW, you keep mentioning a v5 that I sent. Where is that, exactly? The last round of patches I sent I've kept labeled as "PATCH v4", and I only hit git send-email once. Could you forward me something from this v5 series, so I could see if anything is amiss on my end? -- Mike Shuey On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We would have applied the v3 patchset but now I don't know because we're > up to v5. We can't apply v5 because there are problems with it. No > one responded to v3 so Greg still might apply it or he might find these > email threads too scrambled and delete everything and ask for a resend. > > It's pretty messed up so just wait for Greg to get to it before sending > more patches? > > Basically you should only send patches which you assume will be applied. > If no one responds after 3 days then probably that means everyone from > the peanut gallery (Me, Sudip, Joe, the lustre devs), we don't have an > issue. Then Greg does the last review (2-3 weeks later perhaps). But > if it makes it past all the other reviews then generally Greg also will > be ok with it. > > Greg applies patches in first come, first applied order. If they don't > apply then you have to redo it. He doesn't invest a lot of time into > figuring out why. So you have to coordinate with the other devs, it's > up to you how you do that. > > regards, > dan carpenter > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/