Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:48:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:48:52 -0500 Received: from mail.spylog.com ([194.67.35.220]:62166 "EHLO mail.spylog.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:48:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:57:55 +0300 From: Andrey Nekrasov To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Michael Fu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize the hardware after kernel bootup through kexec Message-ID: <20030124145754.GA1116@an.local> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Nekrasov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael Fu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1042450072.1744.75.camel@aminoacin.sh.intel.com> <1043390954.892.10.camel@aminoacin.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: SpyLOG ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Eric W. Biederman, Once you wrote about "Re: [BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize the hardware after kernel bootup through kexec": > Michael Fu writes: > > > After kernel was bootup through kexec command, the NIC failed to > > initialize. The 2.5.52 kernel was patched with kexec and kexec-hwfix > > patch. > > Interesting... The patch goes cleanly onto newer kernels so feel > free to play with them. You are running a single cpu system > so the kexec-hwfix patch should not make a difference at this point. > > Your interrupt routing is via ACPI interesting... > > > > > the following was is the dmesg output: > > [snip] > > Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver - version 2.1.24-k2 > > Copyright (c) 2002 Intel Corporation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PCI: Enabling device 02:09.0 (0000 -> 0003) > > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 02:09.0 to 64 > > e100: selftest timeout > > e100: Failed to initialize, instance #0 use NIC EEPro100+ on INTEL STL2 motherboard, with "eepro100" driver - all work ok. or "e100" driver and with patch: --- drivers/net/e100/e100.h- Wed Dec 4 15:16:08 2002 +++ drivers/net/e100/e100.h Wed Dec 4 15:16:20 2002 @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ #define E100_MAX_NIC 16 -#define E100_MAX_SCB_WAIT 100 /* Max udelays in wait_scb */ +#define E100_MAX_SCB_WAIT 5000 /* Max udelays in wait_scb */ #define E100_MAX_CU_IDLE_WAIT 50 /* Max udelays in wait_cus_idle */ /* HWI feature related constant */ all work ok. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/