Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:46:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:46:43 -0500 Received: from dial-ctb05175.webone.com.au ([210.9.245.175]:18438 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:46:42 -0500 Message-ID: <3E31701E.4020101@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 03:55:58 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Mansfield CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.59mm5, raid1 resync speed regression. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Mansfield wrote: >Hi Andrew, list, > >I'm booting 2.5.59mm5 to run a database workload benchmark that I've been >running against various kernels. I'll post those results if they are >interesting later, but I did notice that the raid1 resync is proceeding at >half the speed (at best) that it usually does (vs. 2.5.59 that is). > >It currently at about 4-8 mb/sec (and falling as resync progresses), >usually at 12-15 mb/sec. > >System is SMP 2xPIII 866mhz, 2GB ram, raid1 is two 15k U160 (running only >an Ultra speed :-( because the onboard controller sucks) SCSI disks, same >channel on aic7xxx. > >Kernel is 2.5.59-mm5 compiled with gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat >Linux 7.3 2.96-112) > >David > Thanks for the report. Please do post any results you get. What disk workload exactly does a RAID1 resync consist of? Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/