Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:50:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:50:49 -0500 Received: from ns-inetext.inet.com ([199.171.211.140]:9436 "EHLO ns-inetext.inet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:50:39 -0500 Message-ID: <3A8B19BF.ED622DE5@inet.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:50:23 -0600 From: Eli Carter Organization: Inet Technologies, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.5-15 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Richard B. Johnson" , tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, Alan Cox , Peter Missel CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eli Carter Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcnet32.c: MAC address may be in CSR registers In-Reply-To: <3A8AFD5B.FE981F4A@inet.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------64DDDF78A54D4B27F80E537F" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------64DDDF78A54D4B27F80E537F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eli Carter wrote: > I'm dealing with an AMD chip that does not have the station address in > the PROM at the base address, but resides in the "Physical Address > Registers" in the chip (thanks to the bootloader in my case). This > patch makes the driver try those registers if the station address read > from the PROM is 00:00:00:00:00:00. > I think others dealing with similar setups may find this helpful. The > other lance-derived drivers might benefit from a similar patch, but I > don't have that hardware for testing. Two patches, one for 2.2.18 (patch-pcnet32-mac22), and one for 2.4.1 (patch-pcnet32-mac24) which should each apply cleanly. Changes: - Moved address validity check to a function. (Should this go somewhere other drivers can call it?) - Check the second address and set the address to 00:00:00:00:00:00 if it fails - Check the address at open time as well, failing with -EINVAL. I think that should address Alan's initial feedback. What else? TIA, Eli --------------------. Rule of Accuracy: When working toward Eli Carter | the solution of a problem, it always eli.carter@inet.com `--------------------- helps if you know the answer. --------------64DDDF78A54D4B27F80E537F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="patch-pcnet32-mac24" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-pcnet32-mac24" --- linux/drivers/net/pcnet32.c.2.4.1 Wed Feb 14 16:49:31 2001 +++ linux/drivers/net/pcnet32.c Wed Feb 14 17:37:23 2001 @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ struct net_device *next; }; +static int is_valid_ether_addr( char* ); static int pcnet32_probe_vlbus(int cards_found); static int pcnet32_probe_pci(struct pci_dev *, const struct pci_device_id *); static int pcnet32_probe1(unsigned long, unsigned char, int, int, struct pci_dev *); @@ -437,6 +438,18 @@ +/* Check that the ethernet station address is not 00:00:00:00:00:00 and is also + * not a multicast address + * Return true if the address is valid. + */ +int is_valid_ether_addr( char* address ) +{ + int i,isvalid=0; + for( i=0; i<6; i++) + isvalid |= address[i]; + return isvalid && !(address[0]&1); +} + /* only probes for non-PCI devices, the rest are handled by pci_register_driver via pcnet32_probe_pci*/ static int __init pcnet32_probe_vlbus(int cards_found) { @@ -624,10 +637,33 @@ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: %s at %#3lx,", dev->name, chipname, ioaddr); - /* There is a 16 byte station address PROM at the base address. - The first six bytes are the station address. */ - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) - printk(" %2.2x", dev->dev_addr[i] = inb(ioaddr + i)); + /* In most chips, there is a station address PROM at the base address. + * However, if that does not have a valid address, try the "Physical + * Address Registers" CSR12-CSR14 + */ + { + /* There is a 16 byte station address PROM at the base address. + The first six bytes are the station address. */ + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) { + dev->dev_addr[i] = inb(ioaddr + i); + } + if( !is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr) ) { + /* also double check this station address */ + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + unsigned int val; + val = a->read_csr(ioaddr, i+12) & 0x0ffff; + /* There may be endianness issues here. */ + dev->dev_addr[2*i] = val & 0x0ff; + dev->dev_addr[2*i+1] = (val >> 8) & 0x0ff; + } + /* if this is not valid either, force to 00:00:00:00:00:00 */ + if( !is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr) ) + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + dev->dev_addr[i]=0; + } + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + printk(" %2.2x", dev->dev_addr[i] ); + } if (((chip_version + 1) & 0xfffe) == 0x2624) { /* Version 0x2623 or 0x2624 */ i = a->read_csr(ioaddr, 80) & 0x0C00; /* Check tx_start_pt */ @@ -774,6 +810,10 @@ lp->shared_irq ? SA_SHIRQ : 0, lp->name, (void *)dev)) { return -EAGAIN; } + + /* Check for a valid station address */ + if( !is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr) ) + return -EINVAL; /* Reset the PCNET32 */ lp->a.reset (ioaddr); --------------64DDDF78A54D4B27F80E537F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="patch-pcnet32-mac22" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-pcnet32-mac22" diff -u -r1.1.1.6 pcnet32.c --- linux/drivers/net/pcnet32.c 2001/01/20 11:10:30 1.1.1.6 +++ linux/drivers/net/pcnet32.c 2001/02/14 23:30:51 @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ #endif }; +static int is_valid_ether_addr( char* ); int pcnet32_probe(struct device *); static int pcnet32_probe1(struct device *, unsigned long, unsigned char, int, int); static int pcnet32_open(struct device *); @@ -442,6 +443,18 @@ +/* Check that the ethernet station address is not 00:00:00:00:00:00 and is also + * not a multicast address + * Return true if the address is valid. + */ +int is_valid_ether_addr( char* address ) +{ + int i,isvalid=0; + for( i=0; i<6; i++) + isvalid |= address[i]; + return isvalid && !(address[0]&1); +} + int __init pcnet32_probe (struct device *dev) { unsigned long ioaddr = dev ? dev->base_addr: 0; @@ -648,10 +661,33 @@ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: %s at %#3lx,", dev->name, chipname, ioaddr); - /* There is a 16 byte station address PROM at the base address. - The first six bytes are the station address. */ - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) - printk(" %2.2x", dev->dev_addr[i] = inb(ioaddr + i)); + /* In most chips, there is a station address PROM at the base address. + * However, if that does not have a valid address, try the "Physical + * Address Registers" CSR12-CSR14 + */ + { + /* There is a 16 byte station address PROM at the base address. + The first six bytes are the station address. */ + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) { + dev->dev_addr[i] = inb(ioaddr + i); + } + if( !is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr) ) { + /* also double check this station address */ + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + unsigned int val; + val = a->read_csr(ioaddr, i+12) & 0x0ffff; + /* There may be endianness issues here. */ + dev->dev_addr[2*i] = val & 0x0ff; + dev->dev_addr[2*i+1] = (val >> 8) & 0x0ff; + } + /* if this is not valid either, force to 00:00:00:00:00:00 */ + if( !is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr) ) + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + dev->dev_addr[i]=0; + } + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + printk(" %2.2x", dev->dev_addr[i] ); + } if (((chip_version + 1) & 0xfffe) == 0x2624) { /* Version 0x2623 or 0x2624 */ i = a->read_csr(ioaddr, 80) & 0x0C00; /* Check tx_start_pt */ @@ -796,6 +832,10 @@ lp->shared_irq ? SA_SHIRQ : 0, lp->name, (void *)dev)) { return -EAGAIN; } + + /* Check for a valid station address */ + if( !is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr) ) + return -EINVAL; /* Reset the PCNET32 */ lp->a.reset (ioaddr); --------------64DDDF78A54D4B27F80E537F-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/