Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:02:48 +0800
From: Zidan Wang <zidan.wang@freescale.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
CC: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        "Fabio Estevam" <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
        "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Don't try to round-up for
 clock divisor calculation
Message-ID: <20150526110246.GA13725@shlinux2>
References: <1432455161-4924-1-git-send-email-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
 <20150525115812.GG21391@sirena.org.uk> <20150525151127.GA8184@Asurada>
 <CAOMZO5B+GQdXZDfKV6Hz3wXmJCUcXBeWWQxR_jY0n28OnA_gJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150525152424.GA8164@Asurada>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150525152424.GA8164@Asurada>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2015 11:03:46.4440
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 710a03f5-10f6-4d38-9ff4-a80b81da590d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=710a03f5-10f6-4d38-9ff4-a80b81da590d;Ip=[192.88.168.50];Helo=[tx30smr01.am.freescale.net]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1PR03MB249
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1339
Lines: 33

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:24:25AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:13:45PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Nicolin,
> > 
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > Is that possible for you to provisionally revert this patch?
> > > I wanted to wait for the test result from Fabio or Zidan in
> > > the Cc list because I don't have a test environment for SPDIF
> > > even though this change seems to make sense.
> > 
> > I currently don't have access to a SPDIF receiver to test it.
> 
> Okay, let's wait for Zidan then. We only need to test the
> playback route of supporting sample rates.
> 
> Thanks
> Nicolin
I don't have the board which supported by community to test spdif out. So i used the imx7 board
and test it with internal branch.
I found that (txclk_df + 1) is better than txclk_df.
I suspect the patch for clk_round_rate() is not in our branch. Could you please tell me which
patch is for clk_round_rate? I want to cherry-pick it to our branch and test it.

Best Regards,
Zidan Wang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/