Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755186AbbEZQNX (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 12:13:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:37255 "EHLO mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932787AbbEZQMt (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 12:12:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000101d096f2$97457cf0$c5d076d0$@com> References: <1432317791-26851-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <5562BB92.60808@xilinx.com> <000101d096f2$97457cf0$c5d076d0$@com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:12:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/2] Adding driver for Xilinx LogiCORE IP mailbox. From: Moritz Fischer To: Jingoo Han Cc: Michal Simek , jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren_Brinkmann?= , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Greg KH , mchehab@osg.samsung.com, arnd@arndb.de, joe@perches.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1498 Lines: 46 On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Monday, May 25, 2015 3:05 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 05/22/2015 08:03 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: >> > This patchset adds mailbox framework integration for the Xilinx LogiCORE IP >> > mailbox. The Xilinx LogiCORE IP mailbox is a fpga softcore that allows >> > interprocessor communication between AXI4 stream / memory mapped >> > processors. >> > >> > Changes from v0: >> > --------------------- >> > >> > - Several stylistic issues >> > - Dropped superfluous intr_mode member >> > - Really masking the IRQs on mailbox_shutdown >> > - No longer using polling by accident in non-IRQ mode >> > - Swapped doc and driver commits >> >> Changes update should be in every particular patch. >> Also v1 is used to the first version that's why this one should be v2. Thanks for the feedback. I guess making the next round v2 would be less confusing, than restarting the entire patchset from v1? > Right, I agree with Michal Simek's opinion. > If there are 'Changes update' in each patch, it makes people review > the patches more easily. In addition, normally, 'v0' is not used. Sorry about that again. > > Best regards, > Jingoo Han > >> >> Thanks, >> Michal > Thanks, Moritz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/