Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:26:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:26:35 -0500 Received: from as4-1-7.has.s.bonet.se ([217.215.31.238]:41887 "EHLO K-7.stesmi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:26:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3E31F7B0.7090606@stesmi.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 03:34:24 +0100 From: Stefan Smietanowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: BIOS setup needed for LBA48? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. Let's assume a certain IDE controller does LBA48. Let's at the same time assume the BIOS doesn't know jack about LBA48. Let's then assume that I can get a kernel to boot on it, what method I use doesn't matter. The BIOS doesn't lock up or anything but it doesn't use more than the fabled 137GB. Can the Linux Kernel then use the full drive (160GB/250GB/whatever) even though the BIOS doesn't? (LBA48) That's question number 1. Question 2: Does the nForce chipset handle LBA48? They are related but please answer question 1 even if question 2 is "no" :) I tried looking for the answers myself but couldn't find a definite answer. If it's plain in sight somewhere, please point me in the right direction. // Stefan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/