Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:31:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:31:35 -0500 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([195.39.74.230]:46538 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:31:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:40:46 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: John Bradford Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Corrected] Set2 scancodes for Japanese keyboard Message-ID: <20030125184046.A16824@ucw.cz> References: <20030125183001.F16711@ucw.cz> <200301251737.h0PHbcZY001157@darkstar.example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200301251737.h0PHbcZY001157@darkstar.example.net>; from john@grabjohn.com on Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 05:37:38PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 05:37:38PM +0000, John Bradford wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 05:28:25PM +0000, John Bradford wrote: > > > > > Some got missed off the first time: > > > > What kernel this is tested with? What method used? These don't look like > > Set2 codes AT ALL. > > The kernel is 2.4.20. The keycode is the output from showkey, and the > make and break codes are the output from showkey -s. > > Should I have used I8042_DEBUG_IO instead? :-/ With 2.5, yes, that'd be much better. And yet better it'd be if you'd have used the "i8042_direct=1" kernel option, and for set3 the "atkbd_set=3" option. I'm sorry to tell you after you wrote it all down, but these are set1 scancodes you see. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/