Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:36:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:36:54 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:11014 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:36:53 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200301251746.h0PHkZax001209@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: [Corrected] Set2 scancodes for Japanese keyboard To: vojtech@suse.cz (Vojtech Pavlik) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:46:35 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030125184046.A16824@ucw.cz> from "Vojtech Pavlik" at Jan 25, 2003 06:40:46 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > What kernel this is tested with? What method used? These don't look like > > > Set2 codes AT ALL. > > > > The kernel is 2.4.20. The keycode is the output from showkey, and the > > make and break codes are the output from showkey -s. > > > > Should I have used I8042_DEBUG_IO instead? :-/ > > With 2.5, yes, that'd be much better. And yet better it'd be if you'd > have used the "i8042_direct=1" kernel option, and for set3 the > "atkbd_set=3" option. > > I'm sorry to tell you after you wrote it all down, but these are set1 > scancodes you see. I should have realised anyway - I remember now it translates everything to set 1. Oh dear, well, it might take a while - I packed my serial terminal away yesterday, because a wire needs to be soldered on it :-), (which explains why I was writing it all down :-) ) John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/