Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753592AbbFAOSJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:18:09 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:42210 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751930AbbFAOSC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:18:02 -0400
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:17:56 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Martin =?utf-8?B?TGnFoWth?= <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulus@samba.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: introduce new two options for objdump.
Message-ID: <20150601141756.GI624@kernel.org>
References: <54CA2FB2.6070202@suse.cz>
 <20150519140820.GK13946@kernel.org>
 <555B48E6.6000307@gmail.com>
 <20150519143300.GL13946@kernel.org>
 <555C85C9.4050104@suse.cz>
 <20150520130515.GB2955@kernel.org>
 <556C3D8E.2060506@suse.cz>
 <20150601125432.GE624@kernel.org>
 <556C64F8.4000104@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <556C64F8.4000104@suse.cz>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2038
Lines: 47

Em Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> On 06/01/2015 02:54 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> >> On 05/20/2015 03:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>> Em Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:02:01PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> >>>> On 05/19/2015 04:33 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>>>> Em Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:29:58AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > 
> > <SNIP>
> > 
> >>>>>> Perhaps it should be generalized a bit? Right now we have symfs for the
> >>>>>> location of the tree for binaries. What about a srcfs for a source tree?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is a good idea indeed.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was motivated to be able to annotate source code, realized out-of-box. More precisely, on a machine A
> >>>> I run perf record, I moved the report file to machine B and I use these options to annotate source code.
> > 
> > <SNIP>
> > 
> >>> I guess so, and yeah, the feature implemented in your patch has value,
> >>> thanks for collaborating! It is just that it may fit better as a
> >>> complement to the --symfs stuff, that is also for off-box analysis:
> > 
> >>> --symfs=<directory>::
> >>>         Look for files with symbols relative to this directory.
> > 
> >>> Thanks, will wait for further discussion before applying,
> > 
> >> Are we going to wait any longer? It looks there's no discussion effort in this thread ;)
> > 
> > I was waiting for you to follow thru on David's suggestion.

> Ah, I see.
> My answer what kind of that a single new option is no going to enough. As explained in my previous
> post, one needs to cut N components of a path and append a different path.
> 
> I would follow option names starting with --objdump prefix.

David, do you agree?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/