Message-ID: <556C6E2F.7050100@list.ru>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:37:35 +0300
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
CC: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stas Sergeev <stsp@users.sourceforge.net>,
        Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] leds: implement LED_BRIGHTNESS_FAST flag
References: <555CA58A.10700@list.ru> <555CA5FA.2080308@list.ru> <556C1855.7070903@samsung.com> <556C4851.7060900@list.ru> <556C69EA.10000@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <556C69EA.10000@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 920
Lines: 17

01.06.2015 17:19, Jacek Anaszewski пишет:
>> In fact, the things are more complicated: some drivers do small
>> udelay()'s but do not use a work-queue. I was not marking them as
>> FAST, although perhaps they could still be marked as SYNC?
> This could be handled by adding a property to struct led_classdev
> for defining minimum acceptable delay. Then FAST flag should not
> be needed.
Oh c'mon, that's too difficult!
Lets just have a flag whether we can do an SW PWM from hrtimer irq callback.
If we can't do from irq callback - simply do not do anything below 10mS.
IMHO a simple and practical solution.
Otherwise we'll not have anything implemented at all I guess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/