Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:47:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:47:11 -0500 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:28432 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:47:10 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 23:56:13 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Kai Germaschewski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] new modversions implementation Message-ID: <20030125225613.GA9429@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kai Germaschewski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell References: <20030125215637.GA3571@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030125215637.GA3571@mars.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:56:37PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > + > +# Don't rebuilt vermagic.o unless we actually are in the init/ dir > +ifneq ($(obj),init) > +init/vermagic.o: ; > +endif > > The above magic does not look safe to me when utilising parrallel builds. > At least init/vermagic.o needs to be in the prepare: rule. Checked, it is in the prepare: rule, but it looks ugly anyway. Does it really need to be a prerequisite? Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/