Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:01:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:01:42 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:47332 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:01:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 15:10:50 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Larry McVoy , Jason Papadopoulos , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20030125231050.GA21095@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , "Eric W. Biederman" , Larry McVoy , Jason Papadopoulos , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <40475.210.212.228.78.1043384883.webmail@mail.nitc.ac.in> <3.0.6.32.20030124212935.007fcc10@boo.net> <20030125022648.GA13989@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I am wondering if there is any point in biasing page addresses in between > processes so that processes are less likely to have a cache conflict. > i.e. process 1 address 0 %16K == 0, process 2 address 0 %16K == 4K All good page coloring implementation do exactly that. The starting index into the page buckets is based on process id. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/