Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:08:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:08:09 -0500 Received: from out005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.143]:37789 "EHLO out005.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:08:08 -0500 Message-ID: <3E331AA2.38F99839@verizon.net> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 15:15:46 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.54 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rpjday@mindspring.com Subject: Re: restructuring of filesystems config menu References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [4.64.236.51] at Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:17:17 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 07:57:33 -0500 (EST) > From: Robert P. J. Day > Subject: restructuring of filesystems config menu > > i've attached a gzipped patch against 2.5.56 for reorganizing > the filesystem menu under "make xconfig", and i'm certainly > open to feedback/comments/criticism/large sums of money. Good luck with those. :) I finally looked at this on 2.5.59. The fs menu certainly needs some help/work, so I'd like to see you keep plugging away at this. I didn't see much feedback -- was there feedback? Maybe on a different subject/thread? A newer version that I missed? > some points about this patch: > > 1) if anyone wants to carefully check the dependencies and > make sure they're correct, that would be nice. > > 2) perhaps making sure the dependencies match the claims > in the help screens would be helpful. i noticed that > the help screens sometimes make dependency claims that > are wildly untrue, but i didn't want to mess with that > stuff yet as i wasn't totally comfortable. > > 3) much to my delight, i found out by accident that i can > add leading asterisks to menu and config lines with no > effect on the eventual config step -- this makes it > wonderfully easy to edit and reorganize using emacs > outline mode, particularly showing subdependencies. I find it odd that "help" in a Kconfig file can be spelled "help" or "---help---", but "--help--" leads to errors. > is this just a fluke? obviously, it's easy enough to > strip out the leading asterisks in the final version, > but if they're not doing any harm, i'd just as soon > leave them in. I expected to just see the filesystems listed in alpha order, but I don't have a problem with the groupings that you have made for them. Thanks, ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/