Message-ID: <556D94C1.6060300@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:34:25 +0800
From: "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Li zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Huxinwei <huxinwei@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4]: Change arm-gic-its to support the Mbigen interrupt
References: <55692C32.2050209@huawei.com> <556C2226.70502@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <556C2226.70502@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 773
Lines: 27

Hi Marc:
	Thanks for your review.

Accroding to my initial scheme, mbigen and pci devices uses the
same parent domain--MSI domain.

But accroding to your opinion, it seems use the ITS domain as parent domain
of Mbigne is a better way. Am i right ?

Thanks
Ma Jun


在 2015/6/1 17:13, Marc Zyngier 写道:
> Like I said in patch #1, you need to come up with a different approach.
> Use the LPI layer of the ITS as the parent for your MBI, stop messing
> with the PCI stuff, stop poking the ITS internals.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/