Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752127AbbFCDaW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:30:22 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:36521 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751739AbbFCDaP (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:30:15 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,544,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="719758753" Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:30:13 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Adrian Hunter , LKML , Linus Torvalds , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86, tsc: Allow for high latency in quick_pit_calibrate() Message-ID: <20150603033013.GR1187@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20150602194350.GN1187@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20150602202037.GO1187@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20150602233820.GP1187@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20150603003938.GQ1187@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 530 Lines: 13 > Then the changelog should say that I think. The current text says > "Fast TSC calibration will always fail", which, to me, suggests that > either the slow calibration will work or that the changelog message > should be changed. Ok. No, the slow calibration works I believe. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/