Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:18:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:18:02 -0500 Received: from out003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.103]:1988 "EHLO out003.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:18:01 -0500 Message-ID: <3E347C84.8854075A@verizon.net> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:25:40 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.54 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: restructuring of filesystems config menu References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out003.verizon.net from [4.64.238.61] at Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:27:13 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 07:57:33 -0500 (EST) > > > From: Robert P. J. Day > > > Subject: restructuring of filesystems config menu > > > > > > i've attached a gzipped patch against 2.5.56 for reorganizing > > > the filesystem menu under "make xconfig", and i'm certainly > > > open to feedback/comments/criticism/large sums of money. > > > > I finally looked at this on 2.5.59. The fs menu certainly > > needs some help/work, so I'd like to see you keep plugging away > > at this. I didn't see much feedback -- was there feedback? > > Maybe on a different subject/thread? A newer version that I > > missed? > > nope, didn't get much feedback. i sent the patch directly to > linus but it hasn't yet been added. perhaps in 2.5.60? It doesn't apply cleanly to 2.5.59 or later, so it won't be applied. > > I expected to just see the filesystems listed in alpha order, > > but I don't have a problem with the groupings that you > > have made for them. > > i thought about alphabetical order, but i settled on the more > common options at the top, and the more obscure ones further > down. > > if i don't see a patch incorporated in a subsequent release, am > i supposed to submit it again? what's the proper protocol? Get feedback (as much as possible), act on feedback -> make changes, re-re-re-submit... ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/